With press under increasing scrutiny in the wake of "fake news" and (perceived) political bias, you'd think they'd spend an ounce of time doing a little homework before publishing an editorial.
We're not making any statements about the candidate. But, today, this is what the Times had to say about President-Elect Trump's selection of Andrew Puzder as Labor Secretary:
Query what the Times means when they say "[t]here is no evidence that health care reform has harmed job growth, and there is certainly no evidence of a restaurant recession." What? While it may be hard to delineate causation between the ACA and restaurant distress, how can the New York Times say that there is "certainly no evidence" of a restaurant recession?
Perhaps they didn't notice the recent bankruptcy filings of Cosi Inc., Garden Fresh, Fox & Hound, Logan's Roadhouse, Don Pablo's, Buffetts and Champps. We covered the distressed restaurant space here, including the statement in the Garden Fresh supporting first day declaration that causes for the bankruptcy filing include increased healthcare costs, higher minimum wage (in California), and headwinds facing restaurants. Or how about this in the publicly-filed first day declaration supporting Cosi Inc.'s chapter 11 bankruptcy filing: "The deteriorating sales are at least partially due to macro-economic issues as the restaurant industry as a whole and the fast casual sector in particular are experiencing decreasing sales trends."
We can debate to what degree the above constitutes sufficient evidence. Indisputable, however, is that there certainly is more than "no evidence."